> Since it is almost impossible to find any KVM related number on real > world workloads, it would be good to know why. Is it due to KVM still > being in heavy developement? First off, you would have to use the same hardware to do a good comparison. Second, since setting up KVM is not that time consuming or difficult, one could argue that, keeping in mind that the person asking for the performance is looking for an alternative solution, yout could do the benchmarks yourself. Third, since open source programs in general are not aimed at gaining wealth through the distribution of the software itself, providing industry standard (and often senseless) benchmark results is not very high on everyones list of priorities. My 2 cents. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Andreas Olsowski System- und Netzwerktechnik "Sysadmin extraordinaire" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
