Re: Extensions for KVM MSI related ioctls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/13/2015 03:32 PM, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
>> I think I prefer the flag.  Offhand it sounds easier to add support for
>> it to non-ARM architectures, compared to KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI.
> 
>  Actually i also voted for flag, because it is already introduced in (2), and i'm not a fan of
> adding new definitions where we can reuse existing ones. IMHO using flag would make an API more
> consistent.

OK I will respin with user space flag.

Andre, what about the kernel routing entry struct. You wanted me to get
rid of  KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI there too. Will you be able to
manage a usespace wrong setting if the type is not set?

Best Regards

Eric
> 
> Kind regards,
> Pavel Fedin
> Expert Engineer
> Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux