Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Il 30/06/2014 19:39, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
>>>>>> - pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>>>>> + apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't we just use pr_debug all throughout ?
>>>>>
>>>> I don't know. I just tried to make it consistent, since it really bugged
>>>> me while I was debugging the local-apic.
>>>> If you prefer the other way around (which does seem to be better), I can
>>>> do the search-and-replace.
>>>
>>> vcpu number probably could be moved inside apic_debug, at which point
>>> apic_debug becomes preferrable.
>>
>> I am not sure, I think all that could be achieved with a file private
>> debug define can be done with pr_debug which is generic.
>> Nadav didn't introduce apic_debug to this file, so I am
>> fine either way.
>
> I am applying the patch, anything else can be done on top.
Sure, it can but it's sure gonna get forgotten since you are
already applying it :)
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
