On 6/30/14, 3:48 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In two cases lapic.c does not use the apic_debug macro correctly. This patch
fixes them.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index 0069118..3855103 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.apic_arb_prio = 0;
vcpu->arch.apic_attention = 0;
- apic_debug(KERN_INFO "%s: vcpu=%p, id=%d, base_msr="
+ apic_debug("%s: vcpu=%p, id=%d, base_msr="
"0x%016" PRIx64 ", base_address=0x%0lx.\n", __func__,
vcpu, kvm_apic_id(apic),
vcpu->arch.apic_base, apic->base_address);
@@ -1895,7 +1895,7 @@ void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* evaluate pending_events before reading the vector */
smp_rmb();
sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
- pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
+ apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
Why don't we just use pr_debug all throughout ?
I don't know. I just tried to make it consistent, since it really bugged
me while I was debugging the local-apic.
If you prefer the other way around (which does seem to be better), I can
do the search-and-replace.
Nadav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
