Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
>>>> - pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>>> + apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>>
>>> Why don't we just use pr_debug all throughout ?
>>>
>> I don't know. I just tried to make it consistent, since it really bugged
>> me while I was debugging the local-apic.
>> If you prefer the other way around (which does seem to be better), I can
>> do the search-and-replace.
>
> vcpu number probably could be moved inside apic_debug, at which point
> apic_debug becomes preferrable.
I am not sure, I think all that could be achieved with a file private
debug define can be done with pr_debug which is generic.
Nadav didn't introduce apic_debug to this file, so I am
fine either way.
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
