On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:30 +0100, Giuseppe Falsetti wrote: > Hi Hollis, > no I don't have a 440, I have only many 970 :-| > So I can't hope that KVM will support 970 cpus? Qemu already support > this, why for KVM is so difficoult? Implementing KVM for 970 would require emulating the 970 core in the kernel (probably the MMU would be the most difficult). I won't say this is easier or harder than qemu, but it's hard in different ways. > Noone is interested? Or the problem is the HW to develop/test on? I can't speak for anybody else, but I think it's mostly interest. I have a G5 at home, but not enough time/interest to work on KVM for it. > I can participate only as tester, I'm not a developer, but I can provide > the HW for the cause. Unfortunately at this point some pretty low-level development is required. Thanks for your offer though; maybe somebody else on this list will be interested. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
