RE: [kvm-ia64-devel] IRQ assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
> 
> I think option 2 is an obvious no-go solution. We can use 1 on the
> short term, but for the longer term we definately need more than two
> interrupts shared between the devices. I can very well imagine
> situations where we want to have bigger setups so two virtual
> interrupts even though they are just virtual, will completely kill
> the system. 
> 
> I think doing some surgery to qemu here is unavoidable - I'll
> volunteer to shake Avi and Anthony Liguori until they give in :-)

Yes, I also prefer option 1.
Acctually , avi has agreed to do "surgery" for qemu to reduce interrupt
sharing.
He suggest kvm/ia64 use 48 pin virtual IOAPIC, while kvm/x86 use 24 pin
virtual IOAPIC,
I think it's acceptabled for both side.


Best Regards
Anthony


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM Devel]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux