On 2020-01-02 12:39, Andrew Murray wrote:
ARMv8.5-PMU introduces 64-bit event counters, however KVM doesn't yet
support this. Let's trap the Debug Feature Registers in order to limit
PMUVer/PerfMon in the Debug Feature Registers to PMUv3 for ARMv8.4.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 6e919fafb43d..1b74f275a115 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -672,6 +672,10 @@
#define ID_AA64DFR0_TRACEVER_SHIFT 4
#define ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER_SHIFT 0
+#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24
+
+#define ID_DFR0_EL1_PMUVER_8_4 5
+
#define ID_ISAR5_RDM_SHIFT 24
#define ID_ISAR5_CRC32_SHIFT 16
#define ID_ISAR5_SHA2_SHIFT 12
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 9f2165937f7d..61b984d934d1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -668,6 +668,37 @@ static bool
pmu_access_event_counter_el0_disabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return check_pmu_access_disabled(vcpu, ARMV8_PMU_USERENR_ER |
ARMV8_PMU_USERENR_EN);
}
+static bool access_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
+{
+ if (p->is_write)
+ return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, rd);
+
+ /* Limit guests to PMUv3 for ARMv8.4 */
+ p->regval = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
+ p->regval = cpuid_feature_cap_signed_field_width(p->regval,
+ ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT,
+ 4, ID_DFR0_EL1_PMUVER_8_4);
+
+ return p->regval;
If feels very odd to return the register value in place of a something
that actually indicates whether we should update the PC or not. I have
no idea what is happening here in this case.
+}
+
+static bool access_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
+{
+ if (p->is_write)
+ return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, rd);
+
+ /* Limit guests to PMUv3 for ARMv8.4 */
+ p->regval = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1);
+ p->regval = cpuid_feature_cap_signed_field_width(p->regval,
+ ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT,
+ 4, ID_DFR0_EL1_PMUVER_8_4);
+
+ return p->regval;
Same here.
+}
+
static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params
*p,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
@@ -1409,7 +1440,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[]
= {
/* CRm=1 */
ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR0_EL1),
ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR1_EL1),
- ID_SANITISED(ID_DFR0_EL1),
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1), access_id_dfr0_el1 },
How about the .get_user and .set_user accessors that were provided by
ID_SANITISED and that are now dropped? You should probably define a
new wrapper that allows you to override the .access method.
+
ID_HIDDEN(ID_AFR0_EL1),
ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR0_EL1),
ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR1_EL1),
@@ -1448,7 +1480,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[]
= {
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,7),
/* CRm=5 */
- ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1),
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), access_id_aa64dfr0_el1 },
ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(5,2),
ID_UNALLOCATED(5,3),
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
