On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:32:17 +0000, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Catalin, > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Catalin, Will: given that this series conflicts with the workaround for > > erratum 1542419, do you mind taking it via the arm64 tree? > > I assume you target 5.5 with this workaround. Absolutely. I'm happy to look at backports once this is in. > I don't mind merging it but if you want to queue it, we already have > a stable for-next/neoverse-n1-stale-instr branch with 1542419 (I'll > push a fixup on top soon for a clang warning). The other issue is > that we get a conflict with mainline due to the tx2 erratum. If it > gets too complicated, I'll also merge for-next/fixes into > for-next/core. OK, let me have another look at providing a resolution that includes all of the above. Worse case, you'll be able to pull the branch directly. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
