Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: KVM: Prevent speculative S1 PTW when restoring vcpu context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

On 19/10/2019 10:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When handling erratum 1319367, we must ensure that the page table
> walker cannot parse the S1 page tables while the guest is in an
> inconsistent state. This is done as follows:
> 
> On guest entry:
> - TCR_EL1.EPD{0,1} are set, ensuring that no PTW can occur
> - all system registers are restored, except for TCR_EL1 and SCTLR_EL1
> - stage-2 is restored
> - SCTLR_EL1 and TCR_EL1 are restored
> 
> On guest exit:
> - SCTLR_EL1.M and TCR_EL1.EPD{0,1} are set, ensuring that no PTW can occur
> - stage-2 is disabled
> - All host system registers are restored

Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>

(whitespace nit below)


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 69e10b29cbd0..5765b17c38c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,20 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	}
>  
>  	write_sysreg(val, cptr_el2);
> +
> +	if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1319367)) {
> +		struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
> +
> +		isb();
> +		/*
> +		 * At this stage, and thanks to the above isb(), S2 is
> +		 * configured and enabled. We can now restore the guest's S1
> +		 * configuration: SCTLR, and only then TCR.
> +		 */

(note for my future self: because the guest may have had M=0 and rubbish in the TTBRs)

> +		write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[SCTLR_EL1],	SYS_SCTLR);
> +		isb();
> +		write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TCR_EL1],	SYS_TCR);
> +	}
>  }
>  


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> index 7ddbc849b580..fb97547bfa79 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> @@ -117,12 +117,26 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
>  	write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[MPIDR_EL1],		vmpidr_el2);
>  	write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[CSSELR_EL1],	csselr_el1);
> -	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[SCTLR_EL1],	SYS_SCTLR);
> +
> +	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1319367)) {
> +		write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[SCTLR_EL1],	SYS_SCTLR);
> +		write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TCR_EL1],	SYS_TCR);
> +	} else	if (!ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Must only be done for guest registers, hence the context
> +		 * test. We'recoming from the host, so SCTLR.M is already

(Nit: We'recoming?)

> +		 * set. Pairs with __activate_traps_nvhe().
> +		 */
> +		write_sysreg_el1((ctxt->sys_regs[TCR_EL1] |
> +				  TCR_EPD1_MASK | TCR_EPD0_MASK),
> +				 SYS_TCR);
> +		isb();
> +	}



Thanks,

James
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux