Hi, On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Christopher Covington wrote: > > The FSF always grants back rights on the contribution to the > > contributor. ARM could simply double-license their original > > contribution of the disassembler. > > Is dual licensing always possible given a grant-back? What if the > contribution is a derivative of a GPL-3.0 licensed work? Then it's not. I don't think that's the case with ARMs aarch64 disasm, but ultimately only ARM can say, and Peter already hinted that this all isn't possible. Which is a pity, duplicate work, inferior capability (at least for now), and such ... Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
