On 6 February 2014 13:45, Michael Matz <matz@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm, why aren't we simply using the binutils disassembler? It's also > (C) by ARM, so there shouldn't be any relicensing problems. And it > does support AdvSIMD and system instructions. It is GPLv3 which is not compatible with GPLv2 which QEMU requires. The contribution process for binutils involves a copyright assignment which means the FSF now have the copyright there, as I understand it. thanks -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
