Hi, On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Peter Maydell wrote: > Changes v2 -> v3: > * added a README clarifying that libvixl's disassembly support > is not complete and that contributions should go to libvixl > upstream first for preference Hmm, why aren't we simply using the binutils disassembler? It's also (C) by ARM, so there shouldn't be any relicensing problems. And it does support AdvSIMD and system instructions. Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
