Re: [PATCH] KVM: ARM: Enable data-cache in Hyp mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/01/13 17:48, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:20:39 -0500, Christoffer Dall
>>> <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> So, eh..., we seem to have forgotten to enable the data cache in Hyp
>>>> mode.  This makes things more faster.
>>>
>>> Faster should be enough. More faster feels like you're exceeding some
>>> speed limit...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm/kvm/init.S |    4 ++--
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>>>> index f179f10..67ec26c 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>>>> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ __do_hyp_init:
>>>>       mrc     p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0   @ SCTLR
>>>>       ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_EE | HSCTLR_FI)
>>>>       and     r1, r1, r12
>>>> - ARM(        ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I)                  )
>>>> - THUMB(      ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_TE)      )
>>>> + ARM(        ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C )            )
>>>> + THUMB(      ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C |
>>> HSCTLR_TE)
>>>> )
>>>>       orr     r1, r1, r12
>>>>       orr     r0, r0, r1
>>>>       isb
>>>
>>> Nice catch.
>>>
>>> Though you may want to remove the C and I bits from HSCTLR_MASK instead,
>>> so we can honour the CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE and CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE options even
>>> in HYP mode.
>>>
>> Just to be sure, you mean this right?
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>> index 67ec26c..9f37a79 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>> @@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ __do_hyp_init:
>>       ldr     r12, =HSCTLR_MASK
>>       bic     r0, r0, r12
>>       mrc     p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0   @ SCTLR
>> -     ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_EE | HSCTLR_FI)
>> +     ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_EE | HSCTLR_FI | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C)
>>       and     r1, r1, r12
>> - ARM(        ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C )            )
>> - THUMB(      ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C | HSCTLR_TE) )
>> + ARM(        ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A)                     )
>> + THUMB(      ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_TE)         )
>>       orr     r1, r1, r12
>>       orr     r0, r0, r1
>>       isb
>
> Yes, that's what I meant. I was trying to look at whether or not we
> could completely get rid of HSCTLR_MASK (we can't), and ended up mixing
> up the two things...
>
ok, I'll push this change then.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux