Re: [PATCH] KVM: ARM: Enable data-cache in Hyp mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/13 17:48, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:20:39 -0500, Christoffer Dall
>> <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> So, eh..., we seem to have forgotten to enable the data cache in Hyp
>>> mode.  This makes things more faster.
>>
>> Faster should be enough. More faster feels like you're exceeding some
>> speed limit...
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/kvm/init.S |    4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>>> index f179f10..67ec26c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
>>> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ __do_hyp_init:
>>>       mrc     p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0   @ SCTLR
>>>       ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_EE | HSCTLR_FI)
>>>       and     r1, r1, r12
>>> - ARM(        ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I)                  )
>>> - THUMB(      ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_TE)      )
>>> + ARM(        ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C )            )
>>> + THUMB(      ldr     r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C |
>> HSCTLR_TE)
>>> )
>>>       orr     r1, r1, r12
>>>       orr     r0, r0, r1
>>>       isb
>>
>> Nice catch.
>>
>> Though you may want to remove the C and I bits from HSCTLR_MASK instead,
>> so we can honour the CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE and CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE options even
>> in HYP mode.
>>
> Just to be sure, you mean this right?
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
> index 67ec26c..9f37a79 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/init.S
> @@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ __do_hyp_init:
>  	ldr	r12, =HSCTLR_MASK
>  	bic	r0, r0, r12
>  	mrc	p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0	@ SCTLR
> -	ldr	r12, =(HSCTLR_EE | HSCTLR_FI)
> +	ldr	r12, =(HSCTLR_EE | HSCTLR_FI | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C)
>  	and	r1, r1, r12
> - ARM(	ldr	r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C )	      )
> - THUMB(	ldr	r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_I | HSCTLR_C | HSCTLR_TE) )
> + ARM(	ldr	r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A)			)
> + THUMB(	ldr	r12, =(HSCTLR_M | HSCTLR_A | HSCTLR_TE)		)
>  	orr	r1, r1, r12
>  	orr	r0, r0, r1
>  	isb

Yes, that's what I meant. I was trying to look at whether or not we
could completely get rid of HSCTLR_MASK (we can't), and ended up mixing
up the two things...

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux