Re: [PATCH/RFC] KVM: ARM: VFP userspace interface.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11 September 2012 07:10, Rusty Russell <rusty.russell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +/* VFP registers: we could overload CP10 like ARM does, but that's ugly. */
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP                        (0x0012 << KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT)
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_MASK                0x000000000000FFFF
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_BASE_REG    0x0

...this is the base for the main VFP registers, right? Why does it have
'ID' in its name?

> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_FPSID       0x1000
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_FPSCR       0x1001
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_MVFR0       0x1006
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_MVFR1       0x1007
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_FPEXC       0x1008
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_FPINST      0x1009
> +#define KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_ID_FPINST2     0x100A

-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux