On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:02:42 +0200, Christoffer Dall <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'll apply this one (why not), but why do we have this code if we > never call it. I forget the original intention behind the trace point, > but wouldn't it be useful now to trace all the cp15 accesses in the > emulate_cp15 function and be rid of the "bool trace" argument? I don't know, I've never used these tracepoints, so I kept behaviour as-is. My guess is that we want a tracepoint for all cp15 accesses and a separate tracepoint for failed cp15 accessed. I can do that if you'd like... Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
