On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty.russell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:02:42 +0200, Christoffer Dall <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'll apply this one (why not), but why do we have this code if we >> never call it. I forget the original intention behind the trace point, >> but wouldn't it be useful now to trace all the cp15 accesses in the >> emulate_cp15 function and be rid of the "bool trace" argument? > > I don't know, I've never used these tracepoints, so I kept behaviour > as-is. > > My guess is that we want a tracepoint for all cp15 accesses and a > separate tracepoint for failed cp15 accessed. > > I can do that if you'd like... no worries, I'll take care of it for v10. thanks. -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
