On Saturday 02 January 2010, Vikram Dhillon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> > of recent regressions. > >> > > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > >> > (either way). > >> > > >> > > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940 > >> > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression > >> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old) > >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4 > >> > >> I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already > >> known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was > >> a trade off that was made to improve latencies. > > > > OK, I've closed it as "documented". > > > > Rafael > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > Thanks for this update, I guess we I can make like a separate category > of documented regressions because this could be helpful to other > distributions as they update to the newer kernels :D That actually is easy to get. ;-) * Go to bug #14885, which is a meta-bug for post-2.6.32 regressions. * Go to the dependency tree. * Click on "Show resolved". * Click on "view as bug list". * Search for "DOCU". Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
