On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> > of recent regressions. >> > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know >> > (either way). >> > >> > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940 >> > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression >> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old) >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4 >> >> I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already >> known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was >> a trade off that was made to improve latencies. > > OK, I've closed it as "documented". > > Rafael > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Thanks for this update, I guess we I can make like a separate category of documented regressions because this could be helpful to other distributions as they update to the newer kernels :D -- Regards, Vikram Dhillon ~~~ There are lots of Linux users who don't care how the kernel works, but only want to use it. That is a tribute to how good Linux is. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
