On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940 > > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression > > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4 > > I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already > known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was > a trade off that was made to improve latencies. OK, I've closed it as "documented". Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
