* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rusty, > > I've gotten some good traction on the changes in the following patch. > About 30% of the kernel is compiling right now and I'm picking up > errors and warnings as I'm going along. I think it's doing most of > what we need. Attempting to hide the cpumask struct definition caused > all kinds of problems with the inline functions and statically > declaring cpumask's. > > (The following patch is a combination of all the changes to cpumask.h > with the header from the first patch. I'll send you a complete copy > in separate email.) could you please send whatever .c changes you have already, so that we can have a look at how the end result will look like? Doesnt have to build, i'm just curious about how it looks like in practice, semantically. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
