On Saturday, 27 of September 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:56:46PM +0200] > | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > | of recent regressions. > | > | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > | from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > | (either way). > | > | > | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 > | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? > | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old) > | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 > | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> > | Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > | > | > > Hi Rafael! > > Well, Thomas already explained > > | The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with > | nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug > | alive to chase the other issues. > | > | Thanks, > | > | tglx > > so we either have to change the topic of this bug or better > close it and post new one nmi_watchdog related. I may do so > but since Joshua was opening bug it would be better if he > make such an action. How do you think? (I've asked Joshua > for additional info but it seems he is too busy now) I had tried to close it, but someone reopened it afterwards. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
