On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:56:35PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 02:52:46PM +0000, Catalin Marinas via Libc-alpha wrote: > > Now, if the dynamic loader silently ignores the mprotect() failure on > > the main executable, is there much value in exposing a flag in the aux > > vectors? It saves a few (one?) mprotect() calls but I don't think it > > matters much. Anyway, I don't mind the flag. > I don't see a problem with the aforementioned patch [2] to pre-set BTI > on the pages of the main binary. Me either FWIW.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
