On Thursday, December 15, 2022 11:20:50 PM Duncan wrote: > Options: > > * Bring (existing) window to current virtual desktop > > IIRC this is the new default, and seems to be the behavior you're > describing as unwanted. > > * Switch to that virtual desktop (and raise the existing window there) > > This is what I chose as it makes more sense to me. > > Old and definitely confusing but arguably could-be-useful behavior, now > missing option: Definitely useful / preferred behavior for me. As I'm going through my emails, I click on links that I want to read later (usually after getting through some portion of my emails). With my old versions of firefox (still in use) I am not distracted from my email reading. On my most recent installation of (Debian Jesse / Firefox (yes, I know)), when I click on a link in an email it immediately switches me to the firefox desktop and "raises" that window. (Aside: on that machine (not the one I use for most email) I have two firefox installations -- one the original with Jessie, another much more recent version for web sites that doesn't work with -- as I write this, I don't remember which version of firefox has the described behavior -- maybe the newer one). Very distracting / aggravating. Please keep / restore the old behavior. As a workaround, I copy the links while I'm reading email on that computer, then paste them into Firefox later. -- rhk (sig revised 20221206) If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML; avoid top posting; and keep it "on list". (Oxford comma (and semi-colon) included at no charge.) If you revise the topic, change the Subject: line. If you change the topic, start a new thread. Writing is often meant for others to read and understand (legal documents excepted?) -- make it easier for your reader by various means, including liberal use of whitespace (short paragraphs, separated by whitespace / blank lines) and minimal use of (obscure?) jargon, abbreviations, acronyms, and references. If someone has already responded to a question, decide whether any response you add will be helpful or not ... A picture is worth a thousand words. A video (or "audio"): not so much -- divide by 10 for each minute of video (or audio) or create a transcript and edit it to 10% of the original. A speaker who uses ahhs, ums, or such may have a real physical or mental disability, or may be showing disrespect for his listeners by not properly preparing in advance and thinking before speaking. (Remember Cicero who did not have enough time to write a short missive.) (That speaker might have been "trained" to do this by being interrupted often if he pauses.) A radio (or TV) station which broadcasts speakers with high pitched voices (or very low pitched / gravelly voices) (which older people might not be able to hear properly) disrespects its listeners. Likewise if it broadcasts extraneous or disturbing sounds (like gunfire or crying), or broadcasts speakers using their native language (with or without an overdubbed translation). A person who writes a sig this long probably has issues and disrespects (and offends) a large number of readers. ;-) '