On Wednesday October 21 2020 13:18:13 Stakanov wrote: >I am NOT going to die stupid though: what is MANTBS (I failed to find it). ;-) Move Along Nothing To Be Seen
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:00:58 +0200
- In-reply-to: <3214417.gtEc7Xohrc@roadrunner>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <6767612.SJBaYvPHWY@bola> <3214417.gtEc7Xohrc@roadrunner>
- User-agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/4.14.23-ck1-mainline-core2-rjvb; KDE/4.14.38; x86_64; ; )
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: René J.V. Bertin
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: Stakanov
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Index(es):
 |