On Wednesday October 21 2020 08:30:15 Peter Humphrey wrote: >> > Vary <> Differ. >> > >> > 'Vary' implies change, not difference. >> >> It is OT but funny: with YMMD (differ), which exists alongside the use of >> YMMV, you are running into confusion with You made my day (YMMD). >> But thank you for the heads up, I appreciate. >> >> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/your_mileage_may_vary > >I hadn't come across 'you made my day.' I suppose that would be a problem. YMMVoD T,FTFY MANTBS R.
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:00:56 +0200
- In-reply-to: <11624073.O9o76ZdvQC@peak>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <3719423.jWIq0fOZj2@roadrunner> <11624073.O9o76ZdvQC@peak>
- User-agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/4.14.23-ck1-mainline-core2-rjvb; KDE/4.14.38; x86_64; ; )
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: Stakanov
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Index(es):
 |