In data mercoledì 21 ottobre 2020 11:00:56 CEST, René J.V. Bertin ha scritto: > On Wednesday October 21 2020 08:30:15 Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> > Vary <> Differ. > >> > > >> > 'Vary' implies change, not difference. > >> > >> It is OT but funny: with YMMD (differ), which exists alongside the use of > >> YMMV, you are running into confusion with You made my day (YMMD). > >> But thank you for the heads up, I appreciate. > >> > >> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/your_mileage_may_vary > > > >I hadn't come across 'you made my day.' I suppose that would be a problem. > > YMMVoD > > T,FTFY > > MANTBS > > R. I am NOT going to die stupid though: what is MANTBS (I failed to find it). ;-)
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: Stakanov <stakanov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:18:13 +0200
- In-reply-to: <6767612.SJBaYvPHWY@bola>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <11624073.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> <6767612.SJBaYvPHWY@bola>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: René J.V. Bertin
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- From: René J.V. Bertin
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Index(es):
 |