Bertin wrote:
> In fact, I just realise that much of what I read and my own experience
> make me think of Microsoft products from a certain era...
To dedicated Linux users, that may well be the ultimate put-down...
--
Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359
dave@xxxxxxxxxxx dhclose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Controlling complexity is the essence of computer programming."
-- Brian Kernighan
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Dave Close <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:41:25 -0700
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:54:54 +0200." <1747510.rIXOF8Rig1@bola>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <c5154d613571d6199793797e08b0026c8df66552.camel@adminart.net> <2042044.irdbgypaU6@peak> <1747510.rIXOF8Rig1@bola>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: René J.V. Bertin
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: hw
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: René J.V. Bertin
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Index(es):
 |