Re: [RFC][PATCHES v2] xattr stuff and interactions with io_uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 02:57:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2024, at 07:51, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 08:43:31AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> Tested on arm64, fwiw I get these:
> >> 
> >> <stdin>:1603:2: warning: #warning syscall setxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
> >> <stdin>:1606:2: warning: #warning syscall getxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
> >> <stdin>:1609:2: warning: #warning syscall listxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
> >> <stdin>:1612:2: warning: #warning syscall removexattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
> >
> > arch/arm64/tools/syscall*.tbl bits are missing (as well as
> > arch/sparc/kernel/syscall_32.tbl ones, but that's less of an
> > issue).
> >
> > AFAICS, the following should be the right incremental.  Objections, anyone?
> 
> Looks fine to me.
> 
> I have a patch to convert s390 to use the exact same format
> as the others, and I should push that patch, but it slightly
> conflict with this one.
> 
> We can also remove the old include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> that is no longer used.

I'd suggest starting with Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst, then...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux