Re: [RFC][PATCHES v2] xattr stuff and interactions with io_uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 3, 2024, at 07:51, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 08:43:31AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Tested on arm64, fwiw I get these:
>> 
>> <stdin>:1603:2: warning: #warning syscall setxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>> <stdin>:1606:2: warning: #warning syscall getxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>> <stdin>:1609:2: warning: #warning syscall listxattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>> <stdin>:1612:2: warning: #warning syscall removexattrat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>
> arch/arm64/tools/syscall*.tbl bits are missing (as well as
> arch/sparc/kernel/syscall_32.tbl ones, but that's less of an
> issue).
>
> AFAICS, the following should be the right incremental.  Objections, anyone?

Looks fine to me.

I have a patch to convert s390 to use the exact same format
as the others, and I should push that patch, but it slightly
conflict with this one.

We can also remove the old include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
that is no longer used.

I was planning to have a patch by now to only need to chance a
single .tbl file for new entries, which is a bit behind some
other work I have planned for these files.

      Arnd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux