Re: Large CQE for fuse headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 13:53, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't think that complicated. In the end it is just another pointer
> that needs to be mapped. We don't even need to use mmap.
> At least for zero-copy we will need to the ring non-fuse requests.
> For the DDN use case, we are using another io-uring for tcp requests,
> I would actually like to switch that to the same ring.

Okay, let's try and see how that works.

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux