Re: Large CQE for fuse headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 04:44, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It also depends on how fuse user code consumes the big CQE payload, if
> fuse header needs to keep in memory a bit long, you may have to copy it
> somewhere for post-processing since io_uring(kernel) needs CQE to be
> returned back asap.

Yes.

I'm not quite sure how the libfuse interface will work to accommodate
this.  Currently if the server needs to delay the processing of a
request it would have to copy all arguments, since validity will not
be guaranteed after the callback returns.  With the io_uring
infrastructure the headers would need to be copied, but the data
buffer would be per-request and would not need copying.  This is
relaxing a requirement so existing servers would continue to work
fine, but would not be able to take full advantage of the multi-buffer
design.

Bernd do you have an idea how this would work?

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux