On 5/17/24 4:24 PM, Mathieu Masson wrote: > On 17 mai 13:09, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 5/17/24 12:51 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >>> Following our LSFMM conversation, I've created a Discord chat for topics >>> that could benefit from a more informal, live discussion space than the >>> mailing list might offer. The idea is to keep this new channel alive for a >>> while and see if it does indeed benefit the broader io_uring audience. >>> >>> The following is an open invite link: >>> >>> https://discord.gg/8EwbZ6gkfX >> >> Great initiative! >> >>> Which might be revoked in the future. If it no longer works, drop me an >>> email for a new one. >>> >>> Once we have some key people around, I intend to add an invite code to >>> the liburing internal documentation. >> >> Is it public - and if not, can it be? Ideally I'd love to have something >> that's just open public (and realtime) discussion, ideally searchable >> from your favorite search engine. As the latter seems >> difficult/impossible, we should at least have it be directly joinable >> without an invite link. Or maybe this is not how discord works at all, >> and you need the invite link? If so, as long as anyone can join, then >> that's totally fine too I guess. >> > > Not to start any form of chat platform war, but the rust-for-linux community has > been using Zulip for a while now. At some point they made the full message > history live accessible without an account : > > https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/ Not a war at all, the only ones I could think of were discord and slack. So really appreciate the input! > It is even search-able apparently, which is quite appreciable as an > outsider who just wants to follow a bit in a more informal way than > the ML. Yep, this is exactly why I brought that up both here and in person, being searchable is really key imho. It allows people to find past discussions by searching for similar keywords. -- Jens Axboe
