Re: [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/16/23 12:47 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 1/16/23 18:43, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/16/23 9:48 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> io_submit_flush_completions() may queue new requests for tw execution,
>>> especially true for linked requests. Recheck the tw list for emptiness
>>> after flushing completions.
>>
>> Did you check when it got lost? Would be nice to add a Fixes link?
> 
> fwiw, not fan of putting a "Fixes" tag on sth that is not a fix.

I'm not either as it isn't fully descriptive, but it is better than
not having that reference imho.

> Looks like the optimisation was there for normal task_work, then
> disappeared in f88262e60bb9c ("io_uring: lockless task list").
> DEFERRED_TASKRUN came later and this patch handles exclusively
> deferred tw. I probably need to send a patch for normal tw as well.

So maybe just use that commit? I can make a note in the message on
how it relates.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux