Re: [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:43:13 -0700
In-reply-to: <6328acdbb5e60efc762b18003382de077e6e1367.1673887636.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0

On 1/16/23 9:48 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> io_submit_flush_completions() may queue new requests for tw execution,
> especially true for linked requests. Recheck the tw list for emptiness
> after flushing completions.

Did you check when it got lost? Would be nice to add a Fixes link?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation
  - From: Pavel Begunkov

References:
- [PATCH for-next 0/5] random for-next patches
  - From: Pavel Begunkov
- [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation
  - From: Pavel Begunkov

Prev by Date: Re: [syzbot] WARNING: refcount bug in mm_update_next_owner
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation
Previous by thread: [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH for-next 1/5] io_uring: return back links tw run optimisation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux