Hi, I have started to use io_uring with kernel 5.11.16 and libev 4.33. Actually, I did significantly change libev code mostly to use liburing instead of replacing most of its boilerplace code for my prototype. There is no SQPOLL thread in my setup. io_uring initialisation is as plain as it can be: ecb_cold static int iouring_internal_init (EV_P) { struct io_uring_params params = { 0 }; if (!have_monotonic) /* cannot really happen, but what if!! */ return -1; if (io_uring_queue_init_params(iouring_entries, &iouring_ring, ¶ms) < 0) return -1; return 0; } I use io_uring for polling O_NONBLOCK TCP sockets. For the most part, io_uring works as expected EXCEPT for this scenario: I want to update the polling mask from POLLIN to POLLIN|POLLOUT. To achieve that, I do submit to SQEs: inline_speed void * iouring_build_user_data(char type, int fd, uint32_t egen) { return (void *)((uint32_t)fd | ((__u64)(egen && 0x00ffffff) << 32 ) | ((__u64)type << 56)); } inline_speed void iouring_decode_user_data(uint64_t data, char *type, int *fd, uint32_t *egen) { *type = data >> 56; *fd = data & 0xffffffffU; *egen = (data >> 32) & 0x00ffffffU; } struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = iouring_sqe_get (EV_A); printf("%d %d remove %d %u\n", oev, nev, fd, (uint32_t)anfds [fd].egen); io_uring_prep_poll_remove(sqe, iouring_build_user_data(IOURING_POLL, fd, anfds [fd].egen)); // io_uring_sqe_set_data(sqe, iouring_build_user_data(IOURING_POLL, fd, anfds [fd].egen)); /* increment generation counter to avoid handling old events */ ++anfds [fd].egen; struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = iouring_sqe_get (EV_A); io_uring_prep_poll_add(sqe, fd, (nev & EV_READ ? POLLIN : 0) | (nev & EV_WRITE ? POLLOUT : 0)); io_uring_sqe_set_data(sqe, iouring_build_user_data(IOURING_POLL, fd, anfds [fd].egen)); printf("%d %d add %d %u\n", oev, nev, fd, (uint32_t)anfds [fd].egen); Followed by a io_uring_enter() call buried in liburing code to submit the 2 sqes at the same time: inline_speed int iouring_enter (EV_P_ ev_tstamp timeout) { int res; struct __kernel_timespec ts; struct io_uring_cqe *cqe_ptr; EV_TS_SET(ts, timeout); EV_RELEASE_CB; res = io_uring_wait_cqe_timeout(&iouring_ring, &cqe_ptr, &ts); EV_ACQUIRE_CB; return res; } On the CQE processing side, I have the following trace: // fd is hardcoded to filter out all the calls working fine if (fd == 85) printf("85 gen %d res %d\n", (uint32_t)gen, res); Here is the output: 85 gen 1 res 195 0 1 add 85 1 // Those 2 sqes are submitted at the same time 1 3 remove 85 1 1 3 add 85 2 85 gen 1 res -125 85 gen 1 res 4 When I receive '85 gen 1 res 4', it is discarded because gen 1 poll request has been cancelled. The code will process gen 2 cqes from there. My '1 3 add 85 2' sqe has been silently discarded. After 1 minute of unexpected fd inactivity, I try to remove my gen 2 POLL request and it result to a cqe reporting an ENOENT error. 1. 195 is the cqe result for a successful IORING_OP_POLL_ADD submission. I only check the POLLIN|POLLOUT bits. What is the meaning of the other bits? 2. I don't understand what I am looking at. Why am I receiving a completion notification for a POLL request that has just been cancelled? What is the logic behind silently discarding a IORING_OP_POLL_ADD sqe meant to replace an existing one? 3. As I am writing this email, I have just noticed that it was possible to update an existing POLL entry with IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE through io_uring_prep_poll_update(). Is this what I should do to eliminate my problems? What are the possible race conditions scenarios that I should be prepared to handle by using io_uring_prep_poll_update() (ie: completion of the poll entry to update while my process is inside io_uring_enter() to update it...)? thx a lot for your guidance in my io_uring journey! Olivier