Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] io_uring: buffer registration enhancements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/2020 11:29 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/14/20 12:09 PM, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote:
Just a ping.  Anything I can do to facilitate the review, please let me
know.

I'll get to this soon - sorry that this means that it'll miss 5.11, but
I wanted to make sure that we get this absolutely right. It is
definitely an interesting and useful feature, but worth spending the
necessary time on to ensure we don't have any mistakes we'll regret
later.

Makes total sense.


For your question, yes I think we could add sqe->update_flags (something
like that) and union it with the other flags, and add a flag that means
we're updating buffers instead of files. A bit iffy with the naming of
the opcode itself, but probably still a useful way to go.

I'll look into that and we can fold it in the next round, would that work?


I'd also love to see a bunch of test cases for this that exercise all
parts of it.


Great idea. Should I send out the liburing changes and test cases now, that would definitely help identify the gaps early.

Thanks.

--bijan





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux