Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] io_uring: buffer registration enhancements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/20 12:09 PM, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote:
> Just a ping.  Anything I can do to facilitate the review, please let me 
> know.

I'll get to this soon - sorry that this means that it'll miss 5.11, but
I wanted to make sure that we get this absolutely right. It is
definitely an interesting and useful feature, but worth spending the
necessary time on to ensure we don't have any mistakes we'll regret
later.

For your question, yes I think we could add sqe->update_flags (something
like that) and union it with the other flags, and add a flag that means
we're updating buffers instead of files. A bit iffy with the naming of
the opcode itself, but probably still a useful way to go.

I'd also love to see a bunch of test cases for this that exercise all
parts of it.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux