On 6/8/20 6:14 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> hi,
>
>> On 08/06/2020 02:29, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 6/7/20 2:57 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> -#define INIT_IO_WORK(work, _func) \
>>>> +#define INIT_IO_WORK(work) \
>>>> do { \
>>>> - *(work) = (struct io_wq_work){ .func = _func }; \
>>>> + *(work) = (struct io_wq_work){}; \
>>>> } while (0) \
>>>>
>>>
>>> Would be nice to optimize this one, it's a lot of clearing for something
>>> we'll generally not use at all in the fast path. Or at least keep it
>>> only for before when we submit the work for async execution.
>>
>> Let's leave it to Xiaoguang and the series of the topic.
> Yeah, I'd be glad to continue this job, thanks.
Perfect! I think io_uring-5.8 (as of now) will be a great base for
that.
--
Jens Axboe
