On 08/06/2020 02:29, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/7/20 2:57 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> -#define INIT_IO_WORK(work, _func) \
>> +#define INIT_IO_WORK(work) \
>> do { \
>> - *(work) = (struct io_wq_work){ .func = _func }; \
>> + *(work) = (struct io_wq_work){}; \
>> } while (0) \
>>
>
> Would be nice to optimize this one, it's a lot of clearing for something
> we'll generally not use at all in the fast path. Or at least keep it
> only for before when we submit the work for async execution.
Let's leave it to Xiaoguang and the series of the topic.
>
> From a quick look at this, otherwise looks great! Please do split and
> submit this.
Sure. Have great time off!
--
Pavel Begunkov
