On 08/06/2020 03:12, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/7/20 9:32 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> io_uring_flush() {
>> ...
>> if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || (current->flags & PF_EXITING))
>> io_wq_cancel_pid(ctx->io_wq, task_pid_vnr(current));
>> }
>>
>> This cancels only the first matched request. The pathset is mainly
>> about fixing that. [1,2] are preps, [3/4] is the fix.
>>
>> The [4/4] tries to improve the worst case for io_uring_cancel_files(),
>> that's when they are a lot of inflights with ->files. Instead of doing
>> {kill(); wait();} one by one, it cancels all of them at once.
>>
>> Pavel Begunkov (4):
>> io-wq: reorder cancellation pending -> running
>> io-wq: add an option to cancel all matched reqs
>> io_uring: cancel all task's requests on exit
>> io_uring: batch cancel in io_uring_cancel_files()
>>
>> fs/io-wq.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> fs/io-wq.h | 3 +-
>> fs/io_uring.c | 29 ++++++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> Can you rebase this to include the changing of using ->task_pid to
> ->task instead? See:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/87a71jjbzr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
>
> Might as well do it at the same time, imho, since the cancel-by-task is
> being reworked anyway.
Ok, I was thinking to look there after anyway
--
Pavel Begunkov
