Re: Build 0.6 version fail on musl libc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/29/20 1:33 PM, Milan P. Stanić wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 10:14, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 4/29/20 9:29 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 4/29/20 9:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:24:40AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure what the best fix is there, for 32-bit, your change will truncate
>>>>> the offset to 32-bit as off_t is only 4 bytes there. At least that's the
>>>>> case for me, maybe musl is different if it just has a nasty define for
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe best to just make them uint64_t or something like that.
>>>>
>>>> The proper LFS type would be off64_t.
>>>
>>> Is it available anywhere? Because I don't have it.
>>
>> There seems to be better luck with __off64_t, but I don't even know
>> how widespread that is... Going to give it a go, we'll see.
> 
> AFAIK, __off64_t is glibc specific, defined in /usr/include/fcntl.h:
> ------
> # ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
> typedef __off_t off_t;
> # else
> typedef __off64_t off_t;
> # endif
> ------
> 
> So, this will not work on musl based Linux system, git commit id
> b5096098c62adb19dbf4a39b480909766c9026e7 should be reverted. But you
> know better what to do.
> 
> I come with another quick and dirty patch attached to this mail but
> again  I think it is not proper solution, just playing to find (maybe)
> 'good enough' workaround.

Let's just use uint64_t.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux