On 4/29/20 9:29 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 4/29/20 9:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:24:40AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> >>> Not sure what the best fix is there, for 32-bit, your change will truncate >>> the offset to 32-bit as off_t is only 4 bytes there. At least that's the >>> case for me, maybe musl is different if it just has a nasty define for >>> them. >>> >>> Maybe best to just make them uint64_t or something like that. >> >> The proper LFS type would be off64_t. > > Is it available anywhere? Because I don't have it. There seems to be better luck with __off64_t, but I don't even know how widespread that is... Going to give it a go, we'll see. -- Jens Axboe
