On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 02:07:53PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > [ text/plain ] > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:43:23PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > >> Promising 1us accuracy where we timeout using jiffies is > >> misleading. Convert the _wait_for macro to use milliseconds > >> and convert the 2 callsites. > > > > Note this is not about timeout but the the sleep. The timeout here is > > still as inaccurate as ever as it remains jiffie based. > > > > Hmm no, the sleep is still in usecs at this stage, unmodified. Sleep, yes. Timeout, no. Commit log is talking about timeout. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
