Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [ text/plain ] > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:43:23PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: >> Promising 1us accuracy where we timeout using jiffies is >> misleading. Convert the _wait_for macro to use milliseconds >> and convert the 2 callsites. > > Note this is not about timeout but the the sleep. The timeout here is > still as inaccurate as ever as it remains jiffie based. > Hmm no, the sleep is still in usecs at this stage, unmodified. -Mika > (And I have no qualms about the timeout being too high, unless there is > a specific example that mandates high accuracy.) > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
