On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:59:49PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> The whole file is ignored on CONFIG_ACPI=n. >> >> That's an issue as we can't then acquire the opregion->vbt (which itself >> is not acpi dependent). Shrug no modern system can boot without acpi (at >> least not if you want more than cpu etc), so I guess we also don't care >> that much? > > Interesting, I thought we shouldn't touch ACPI OpRegion for > CONFIG_ACPI=n, but seems that this was changed only in > > commit 27d50c82714f6477ac690034b37d202f76eb4f70 > Author: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Dec 6 16:52:05 2013 +0800 > > ACPI / i915: Fix incorrect <acpi/acpi.h> inclusions via <linux/acpi_io.h> > > So this patch here doesn't change the fact, and since there hasn't been > complaints after the above commit, I wouldn't worry too much. No further complaints, so pushed to drm-intel-next-queued. Thanks for the review. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
