On ma, 2016-04-11 at 16:56 +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > No clue what this is supposed to achieve. I think it's been there > since > the very beginning, so presumably some kind of kludge for very early > silicon. Let's just throw it out. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > index 679f08c944ef..1d21ebfffd4d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > @@ -3319,12 +3319,6 @@ static void valleyview_irq_preinstall(struct > drm_device *dev) > { > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > - /* VLV magic */ > - I915_WRITE(VLV_IMR, 0); > - I915_WRITE(RING_IMR(RENDER_RING_BASE), 0); > - I915_WRITE(RING_IMR(GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE), 0); > - I915_WRITE(RING_IMR(BLT_RING_BASE), 0); > - AFAICS this would also leave the ring interrupts unmasked before we called ring->get_irq(), so at least the change is a fix for that. I haven't found any explanation for the above either, so I guess the best we can do at this point is to see if things continue to work without it: Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > gen5_gt_irq_reset(dev); > > I915_WRITE(DPINVGTT, DPINVGTT_STATUS_MASK); _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx