On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:19:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:29:29AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:57:00PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > There's no real reason the user should care that we're about to fall > > > back to bitbanging, so let's change the message from DRM_INFO to > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94890 > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > KMS or DRIVER though? GMBUS is now independent of KMS, so probably worth > keeping it separate. All the other debug message in the gmbus code are KMS. Keeping to the party line seems best to me. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
