Re: [PATCH] sna: move up the assert check before DBG print message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:33:12AM +0000, Lim, Siew Hoon wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:49:21AM +0800, Lim Siew Hoon wrote:
> > > The assert check for c->bo should be done before DBG, else it will hit
> > > memory access violation when c->bo is null.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lim Siew Hoon <siew.hoon.lim@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Pardon? With a r-b?
> 
> What is a r-b? 
Reviewed-by.

> I'm helping to fix the KW issue hit in our repo side. 

There is no bug in the code, just kw. It is a ternary operator guarding the dereference.

> I suggest the assert checking should be move up before DBG(...) print statement to avoid memory access violation happen if c->bo is NULL for print message. 
> Of cause the chance will be very low to get c->bo is NULL.  

If you look at the code if prints handle=0 if c->bo to indicate the
NULL. Please read the code first.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux